Managing Research for People and Technology- MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theManaging Research for People and Technology. Answer: Critique the problem definition and research problem this research report addressed. The need to improve workplace safety is imperative. Worker perceptions of safety are on the rise, and a lot of improvements in employee engagement and productivity are encouraged. Individual safety has emerged to be the most prioritized phenomenon. This is as a result of most of the dynamic interactions among individuals (Sawacha, E., Shamil, N., Daniel, F, 2012). Key issues which contribute to such social transformation, especially in organizations, include; people, technology, and more o, regulations. Such elements make systems view an important concept. The main aim, in the long run, is to develop the entire system for the comfort of all involved. Accident prevention, related to employee safety and workplace security is the major aspects under consideration. The research problem, in this case, relates to personnel engagement, boredom, and more so, frontline construction (Huang, 2008). The need to consider the most efficient and technical element of safety is advocated for as well. Organizations are expected to come up with the best and the most effective accident models for the sake of including aspects of safety regarding organizational and technical elements. Construction safety is the most advocated element in this research paper. The construction industry, which is developing at a rapid rate, is expected to adhere to all regulations and legal requirements especially for the primary purposes of improving productivity and high levels of effectiveness. The construction industry is placed in the limelight in this research (Cox, S., Tom, C, 2008). Construction site operations are very complex and more so, emergent in the contemporary world. Safety management systems can be provided, to curb accidents and more so, address interactions among organizations. The safety culture and embracement of caution in most organizations need to be encouraged. Over the past two decades, there has been increasing attention about the need to address interactions among subsystems and foster the conceptualization of safety climate constructs in the main organizations. The need to feel safe at work is a fundamental element of accident prevention. Trust, and fairness, among other values in the organization, are meant to help promote a sense of psychological safety among employees. In most entities, supervisors are charged with the responsibility of ensuring that employees feel safe in their different workstations. Numerous factors contribute to a worker feeling safe in their workplace. In most cases, basic assurance is considered to be of excellent help regarding safety enhancement and accident prevention in various environments (Tucker, S., Chmiel, N., Hershcovis, M, Stride, C, 2008). Consequently, every individual is charged with the responsibility of ensuring that they minimize the rates of accident occurrence through maintaining accountability in the long run. This research report has provided full coverage to the problem of safety in the workplace. The problem of increased workplace accidents, injuries and continuous irresponsibility in the organization has also been highly condemned. Evidently, every person has a responsibility to keep its workers safe. Legal standards need to be fully embraced, and more so, regulations complied with to avoid litigation. Anticipating any problem before it occurs is a major strategy of mitigating accidents (Probst, T, Brubaker, T, 2001). The capacity to visualize possible future events is highly encouraged to solve the problem under consideration. Are the methods used to collect data (e.g., focus groups, questionnaires) sufficiently justified and described? The best way to know if the methods used to collect data were efficient or not is by looking at the type of information that is needed in the research. In this case, the information that was needed must have been factual and detailed. Therefore, the most appropriate method is that one that engages the stakeholders in the industry (Fang, D., Chen, Y., Wong, L, 2006). The interviews and follow-up surveys were used in collecting data, and that is a clear indication that the methods were sufficiently justified. Why were they efficiently justified? The research needed to know more about the safety of workers in the construction industry. Such means that there was no short cut but to hear from the people who are in the industry. The construction industry is one of the delicate industries when it comes to research; one does not just make assumptions and try to support them with opinions, one must dig deeper and know what is happening on the ground (Cox, S., Tom, C, 2008). The methods used make sure that the researchers did not make conclusions from a boardroom but the ground. To show that the methods were efficient, it is good to look at the supporting evidence that has been provided in the research. According to the report, frontline safety officers and frontline supervisors were interviewed. These were the people who would know more about safety in constructions sites. The method of making sure that their views, as well as observations, were collected makes the whole process justifiable and of help to the researchers. When it comes to describing the methods, such was done in a manner that made each and every person reading the report understood. There are facts that support the point (Torner, M., Anders, P, 2009). First, even before going deeper and reading the whole research, the abstract makes it clear that qualitative method is to be used in gathering all the information needed (Brown, R, Holmes, H, 1986). After going into the report, one can see how the whol e method was used, and that is made possible by the fact that the explanation given is detailed. What further information (if any) do you require? For the sake of knowing more about the topic of research, there is more information that would be of help to me. First, the concentration was given to a specific organization. The organization is a multi-billion organization, and that means that it has a lot of resources. My question would be; are the same issues facing the organization the same issues that face other developing organizations? It is important to note that the construction industry is large and huge (Brown, 2014). There are small organizations that are finding their way into the industry. With this in mind, it is essential to dig deeper and provide information that has not only been collected from established organizations but from across the divide. The other information that I am interested in is the role that each and every stakeholder plays in workplace safety (Fang, D., Chen, Y., Wong, L, 2006). Such includes people who make the situation worse and the people who pay a significant role in containing the situatio n. Data Analysis Strategy Qualitative Research The qualitative approach of research is a more holistic way of data collection that is usually harnessed without help from statistical or mathematical figures (Silverman, 2016). It requires a more intuitive approach with a lot of emphasis on context (Taylor, S., Bogdan, R., DeVault, M., 2015). The writer exercised tools of qualitative analysis such as interviewing focus groups. The focus group interviewed included 25 frontline supervisors who were all male and 2 safety supervisors who were female. The interviews were thorough in that the time allocated stretched between 60 and 90 minutes and involved up to 9 attendees. The interviews were conducted when all of the participants were on duty and when they were either starting or ending a shift. The sessions had supervisors present and audio tapes were recorded. The main purpose of the focus groups was to understand the causes of accidents and since qualitative analysis puts into consideration human behavior more than numbers and figures (Liamputtong, 2013). Thus, practical examples were used such as the force-field methodology that was used to draw out the views of the supervisors. The football field example was fruit-bearing, and several conclusions were made such as determining factors both internal and external that resulted in causing accidents. Survey Research A survey research is a data collection method conducted by primarily asking questions (Fowler, 2013). Its main purpose according to several sources is to assess thoughts, opinions, and feelings. Here, the survey involved 207 frontline workers with different levels of experience. Over half the workers interviewed had more than three years of experience, and the survey showed that 30% of the respondents had experienced a notable accident in the past year. Reliability Analysis According to reliability analysis experts, a scale should consistently reflect the construct it is measuring (Zio, 2013). The researchers developed a composite scale to determine how safe the workers felt. The final construct was put to the test and items in the composite scale were found to be unidimensional. Also, the researcher also conducted a safety climate questionnaire. Safety climate refers to a workgroup's perceived true value of safety in an organization. Tacit Safety and Explicit Safety Factor analysis as a statistical method used to describe variability among observed, correlated variables regarding a potentially lower number of unobserved variables called factors (Brown, 2014). To assess the independence of the external and internal safety measure, the researcher performed a principal axis analysis on the nine variables contributing to both safeties climate and feeling safe constructs. Presentation and Communication Research is an exacting job and requires a lot of patience and skill for a researcher to achieve exemplary reports. Several aspects of a good research report can be used to evaluate the quality of the above report based on the researchers communication and presentation skills. Attention to Detail The researcher has gone to great extents to ensure that the journal is thorough and rigorous. The attention to detail is exceptional as every topic and subtopic have been exhausted and elaborated. The facts and figures presented have been properly and satisfactorily explained and the subject matter extensively discussed. The presentation gives a complete picture of the problem under investigation as all the issues that the reader could fin relevant to the subject matter have been fully addressed. Accuracy The importance of the above research journal cannot be overstated as, like any other research project, it is dealing with issues of huge magnitude in regards to decision and policy making. Accuracy is of utmost importance (Denscombe, 2014). The researcher in the above case has done a commendable job in ensuring that the research presented based on facts and all the references and ideologies presented are verifiable, factual and reliable. The mentioning of the personnel involved in the research process that is the interviews and the questionnaires gives support to the legality of the research conducted. Clarity of Thought Everything from the research problem should express clarity. The researcher, in this case, has demonstrated impressive clarity of thoughts from the introduction and the mentioning of the research problem under investigation to the topics of discussion are all presented in a clear flow. Style and Formatting All research components such as introduction, findings, and recommendations have been properly crafted and are relevant to the research topic. The report has been written down from a third persons perspective. This is crucial because a research report is intended for the person who needs it and not the person who writes it down. The researcher in the above report has used proper font size and italic fonts and bolded fonts where necessary, and the general outlay is easy to follow through. Non-partisan approach A writers work should be unprejudiced in both fact and fault finding. Their personal opinions and or emotions should not be reflected on the paper, and the presentation should be neutral. The facts and opinions presented in the above research article are not biased, and the communication does not signal any prejudice, and the findings are genuine to the topic under investigation (Davies, M., Hughes, N., 2014). Comprehensible Finally, the writer of the above research project has delivered a lucid and well-organized document with moderate vocabulary and is the language use is comprehensible. Bibliography Brown, R, Holmes, H. (1986). The Use of A Factor Analytic Procedure for Assessing the Validity of an Employee Climate Safety Model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18(6), 455-470. Brown, T. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications. Cox, S., Tom, C. (2008). The Structure of Employee Attitudes to Safety: A European Example. Work and Stress, 93-106. Davies, M., Hughes, N. (2014). Doing a successful research project: Using qualitative or quantitative methods. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: for small-scale research projects. McGraw-Hill Education. Fang, D., Chen, Y., Wong, L. (2006). Safety Climate in Construction Industry: A Case Study in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(6), 573-584. Fowler, F. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage Publications. Huang, Y. (2008). Safety Climate and Self-Reported Injury: Assessing the Mediating Role of Employee Safety Control. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 425-433. Liamputtong, P. (2013). Qualitative research methods. Probst, T, Brubaker, T. (2001). The Effects of Job Insecurity on Employee Safety Outcomes: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Explorations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(2), 139. Sawacha, E., Shamil, N., Daniel, F. (2012). Factors Affecting Safety Performance on Construction Sites. International Journal of Project Management, 309-315. Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage. Taylor, S., Bogdan, R., DeVault, M., (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley Sons. Torner, M., Anders, P. (2009). Safety in Construction: A Comprehensive Description of the Characteristics of High Standards in Construction Work, from the Combined Perspective of Supervisors and Experienced Workers. Journal of Safety Research, 40(6), 399-409. Tucker, S., Chmiel, N., Hershcovis, M, Stride, C. (2008). Perceived Organizational Safety for and Employee Safety Voice: The Mediating Role of Co-worker Support for Safety. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(4) 319. Zio, E. (2013). The Monte Carlo simulation for system reliability and risk analysis. 198.